ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

‘Beg to Humbly Pray’

The language of our courts is strange, archaic, and can lead to fostering inequity.

A few weeks ago, I found myself, for the first time in my 11 years as a lawyer, talking to a sitting high court judge on the phone. And, for the first time, I was unsure of whether to address him as “Your Lordship” or not. I fumbled between “Sir” and “Lordship,” and “M’lord,” and even “Sirship” at one point. I have a thumb rule: I address them as “Lord” within the courts, and “Sir” or “Madam” outside. But, it’s hard to follow that rule when you are in the presence of one of the Lords. 

In this independent, post-constitutional country, what are judges the Lords of, anyway? Why do advocates “beg to humbly pray” before them? Why is a claim (often of one’s right) or a legitimate remedy for one’s wrongs called a “prayer”? Why are judges “pleased” to award sentences? Why do advocates often find themselves “in Lordship’s hands”? Why do advocates start any request to the bench with “May it please my Lords”? What if it doesn’t please them? Why are advocates “much obliged” to the Lordships for everything from an adjournment to a decree?

Dear reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attracive subscription offers.

Click here

Updated On : 8th Feb, 2019

Comments

(-) Hide

EPW looks forward to your comments. Please note that comments are moderated as per our comments policy. They may take some time to appear. A comment, if suitable, may be selected for publication in the Letters pages of EPW.

Back to Top