Trump and Artificial Intelligence

.

Liberalism is a “heap of ethical rubbish” for the far right in the United States (US). After defeating the Democrats, Steve Bannon, Donald Trump’s chief strategist, has declared war against the Republican Party establishment. Bannon, who considers himself an agent of change, is set to purge liberals and globalists from his own party. Trump–Bannon’s anti-liberal rhetoric seeks to rekindle white nationalism, “break the world system and increase US military–corporate power” (Parmar 2017a). The racist duo neither opposes the US empire nor global capitalism, their wrath is directed against the Washington elite who have been running capitalism’s grand show for almost a century. Bannon, in a recent speech at Washington, blamed liberals and not capitalism for shifting factories and jobs to Asia in the 1980s and creating “gutted communities and opioid addicts” in the US (Bannon 2017). The time has come for the decrepit old guard to hang up their boots.

Bannon’s speech also referred to the unprecedented challenge that mankind is expected to confront in the coming 20 years due to “the convergence of biotechnology, artificial intelligence [AI], the computer chip” (Bannon 2017). This is probably the first time that someone from Trump’s team has acknowledged the threat from AI. Although, in March, Steven Mnuchin, the US treasury secretary, told the press that he was “not worried at all” about robots displacing humans in the near future and that AI was “50–100 more years away” (Reid 2017). Trump is yet to tweet about the impact of AI on jobs. He knows that his promise of creating jobs is humbug, it is only a vote-garnering device. Trump is no Luddite, he will not even try to halt the march of technology or harm capitalism in order to restore jobs in factories and offices. In his heart, Trump is probably thanking the liberals for shifting jobs out of the US and inadvertently preparing Americans for the onslaught of joblessness that lies ahead.

To read the full text Login

Get instant access

New 3 Month Subscription
to Digital Archives at

₹826for India

$50for overseas users

Updated On : 15th Nov, 2019

Comments

(-) Hide

EPW looks forward to your comments. Please note that comments are moderated as per our comments policy. They may take some time to appear. A comment, if suitable, may be selected for publication in the Letters pages of EPW.

As the ongoing negotiations bet­ween India and China fail to end the impasse in Ladakh, the de­ma­nd for New Delhi to play the “Tibet card” to...

India had the military ability to evict the intrusions in Ladakh or carry out a quick grab action of its own in the early stages of the crisis....

As foreign offices around the world try to make sense of the disruption in United States–China relations, it is useful to step back and see where...

In the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak, the Sino–American relations have hit a new low. Both the countries are engaged in a propaganda war against...

As a bio-security crisis brings the world to a brink, the dominant neo-liberal vision of world order must be displaced by a humane globalism and...

There is very little to distinguish between the foreign policy of Jawaharlal Nehru and Narendra Modi. Both are equally aligned with America to...

The National Democratic Alliance government’s Kashmir policy can be analysed through the lenses of security studies and peace studies. Insights...

Back to Top