ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Whither 498A?

The arguments of Indira Jaising (“Concern for the Dead, Condemnation for the Living”, EPW, 26 July 2014) on the Supreme Court ruling about increasing misuse of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) are biased.

Mentioning the Supreme Court’s observation, Indira Jaising writes, “When faced with evidence of a poor conviction rate of 15% (juxtaposed with a high rate of charge-sheeting at 93.6%) the Court ought to have been alerted to the fact that the prosecution has not been properly conducted during the trial. Instead, by an inverted logic, these statistics are offered as evidence that an overwhelming majority of these cases, since they result in acquittals, were false cases brought by ‘disgruntled wives’ ” (p 37).

Dear reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here


(-) Hide

EPW looks forward to your comments. Please note that comments are moderated as per our comments policy. They may take some time to appear. A comment, if suitable, may be selected for publication in the Letters pages of EPW.

Back to Top