ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

A Response to Waknis

We thank Parag Waknis for his comment. If nothing else, it succeeds – albeit unintentionally – in providing a fine illustration of the problems with contemporary economics that our article described.

In our article, we suggested that the methodology that has dominated economics for the last generation leaves economists unequipped to make arguments for active macroeconomic policy. Since agents know the true parameters of the distribution of future outcomes and inter-temporally optimise at all points based on that, the link between current income and current expenditure, and the consequent centrality of aggregate demand are broken. The result of this approach is that recessions and periods of high unemployment are simply assumed to be the result of optimising choices on the part of agents. Waknis does not challenge the accuracy of this description of current economic practice; he just does not see anything wrong with it.

To read the full text Login

Get instant access

New 3 Month Subscription
to Digital Archives at

₹826for India

$50for overseas users

Comments

(-) Hide

EPW looks forward to your comments. Please note that comments are moderated as per our comments policy. They may take some time to appear. A comment, if suitable, may be selected for publication in the Letters pages of EPW.

Back to Top