ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Goods and Services Tax in India:An Assessment of the Base

One of the most contentious issues in the discussions surrounding goods and services tax is the likely and feasible rates at which the new regime can be implemented. There have been a number of attempts at estimating the size of the tax base and the corresponding revenue neutral rate. The latest in the series is the report of the Task Force on gst of the Thirteenth Finance Commission. Most of these exercises throw up incredibly low revenue neutral rates resulting in apprehensions about the validity of these estimates and the consequent revenue risk. This paper seeks to estimate the base for the proposed gst on conservative assumptions to arrive at a more realistic estimate of the revenue neutral rates across states.


Goods and Services Tax in India: An Assessment of the Base

R Kavita Rao, Pinaki Chakraborty

One of the most contentious issues in the discussions surrounding goods and services tax is the likely and feasible rates at which the new regime can be implemented. There have been a number of attempts at estimating the size of the tax base and the corresponding revenue neutral rate. The latest in the series is the report of the Task Force on GST of the Thirteenth Finance Commission. Most of these exercises throw up incredibly low revenue neutral rates resulting in apprehensions about the validity of these estimates and the consequent revenue risk. This paper seeks to estimate the base for the proposed GST on conservative assumptions to arrive at a more realistic estimate of the revenue neutral rates across states.

R Kavita Rao ( and Pinaki Chakraborty (pinaki@ are at the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, New Delhi.

ndia has witnessed substantial reforms in indirect taxes over the past two decades and is on the verge of another major reform initiative which will bring this process to a culmination. Central and state domestic indirect taxes transformed themselves from cascading turnover taxes into variants of taxes applied on value addition. However, for both the central taxes and the state taxes, at present the base subject to tax is far from comprehensive. The central taxes do not cover value addition in goods beyond the manufacturing stage, and in services only listed services are covered. On the other hand, in the case of state taxes, only sale of goods is covered. In order to take this process of reforms through the next big change, the finance minister, in his budget speech of 2006-07 announced the introduction of a unified goods and services tax (GST) in 2010. Today we are on the eve of this historic date. While it is far from clear whether the new tax would become operational from 1 April 2010, the contours of the proposed regime are now emerging into the public domain. The release of the discussion paper on the goods and services tax in India in November 2009, to encourage a discussion on the proposed design is an indication of the progress being made towards introducing the new regime in the near future.

1 Introduction

One of the most contentious issues in the discussions surrounding GST is the likely and feasible rates at which the new regime can be implemented. Under this broad rubric, there are two broad issues that emerge. One, “very high rates” of tax, it is argued, will not encourage compliance. There are various notions of what constitutes “very high”. The Kelkar Committee Report had proposed a figure of 20%, and this has become one benchmark for what constitutes limits of an acceptable rate. Second, at whatever be the chosen rates, would all the states and the central government get “adequate” revenue? Here adequate has meant equivalent to that from replacing the existing taxes levied by the states. However, there are no such clear definitions of “adequate” espoused by the central government. Since the central government, in a sense, is the champion of this reform process, the final cost of adjustment, it is assumed, would lie with it. In other words, there are two choices with the central government – one, let the states choose rates that ensure revenue neutrality for each state individually, or negotiate a common rate, with an assurance of a compensation in the event of a shortfall in collection.

In the process of transition to state value added tax (VAT), the central government had exercised the second option and provided a cushion in terms of compensation for revenue shortfall.

Economic & Political Weekly

january 2, 2010 vol xlv no 1


In the present scenario too, there is a discussion of compensation from central resources – the Thirteenth Finance Commission has been assigned the task of factoring in the impact of the introduction of GST while firming up its recommendations. In this context, it is important to understand the size of the GST base in India, within the limits of the design as it emerges from the discussion paper and the likely differentials in the rate of tax that would prove revenue neutral for different states.

There have been a number of attempts at estimating the size of the tax base and the corresponding revenue neutral rate. The latest in the series is the report of the Task Force on GST of the Thirteenth Finance Commission. Most of these exercises throw up incredibly low revenue neutral rates causing apprehension about the validity of these estimates and consequent revenue risk.

This paper seeks to estimate the base for GST in India on conservative assumptions to arrive at more realistic estimate of the revenue neutral rates across states. This is preceded by a discussion of the proposed design of GST in India as laid out in the discussion paper. Some concluding remarks are presented in the last section.

2 Overview of the Discussion Paper on GST

The key features of the proposed GST as laid down in the discussion paper provide a very interesting and useful first reference for any discussion of GST in India. As a beginning, the design proposed in the paper provides considerable detail and structure to the new regime. The key features can be summarised as follows:

• Dual GST: A central and state GST to apply on the same base. Each tax would operate on the principles of input tax credit, where tax credit for each tax would be self-contained. No cross-credit would be allowed except in the case of interstate transactions.

– For interstate transactions, the discussion paper proposes a regime called IGST, wherein the exporter charges IGST in place of the GST in such transactions, claims input tax credit for any taxes paid, and remits the balance to the central government. The exporting state remits any local taxes that are claimed as credit by the exporter to the central government/central administrator. In the importing state, the importing dealer is allowed to claim tax credit for the IGST paid from the central government. The claims across states will be cleared by a central clearing house kind of mechanism. It is proposed to cover both B-B and B-C transactions.

• Uniform state GST threshold is desirable – proposed at Rs 10 lakh.

  • Threshold for central GST for goods could be kept at Rs 1.5 crore and for central GST on services may also be appropriately high.
  • For composition scheme – upper limit of Rs 50 lakh and a floor rate of 0.5% across the states, with option for GST registration if desired.
  • • Rate Structure: Apart from exemptions for all commodities presently exempt in the state VAT system, it is proposed to have two rates – a lower rate for “necessary items and goods of basic importance” and a standard rate. It is suggested that a similar approach be adopted by the centre for taxation of goods. For services, however, a single rate is proposed. It is also proposed that all exports out of the country will be zero-rated and all

    50 imports into the country would be subject to GST, with credit being made available in subsequent transactions.

    • Central and state taxes to be subsumed in GST include central excise, additional excise duties, service tax, additional customs duty, special additional duty of customs, surcharges and cesses, for the centre and state VAT, entertainment tax, luxury tax, betting taxes, state cesses and surcharges on supply of goods and entry tax not in lieu of octroi.

  • On purchase tax there is no clear view.
  • On tobacco, alcohol and petroleum products, it is proposed that status quo remains. In other words, alcoholic products and tobacco would be subject to GST, with traditional excises imposed by states on the former and centre on the latter in the case of petroleum products, it is proposed that crude, motor spirits, diesel and ATF would be kept outside GST.
  • • Multiple Statutes: One for the centre and one each for the states. The discussion paper proposes that the “basic features of law such as chargeability, definition of taxable event and taxable person, measure of levy including valuation provisions, basis of classification, etc, would be uniform across these statutes as far as practicable”.

  • Rules for taking and utilisation of credit for the central GST and the state GST would be aligned.
  • To the extent feasible, uniform procedure for collection of both central GST and state GST would be prescribed in the respective legislation: while separate returns are mandated for the two taxes, it is proposed to aim for a common format.
  • • Tax administration by respective tax departments

  • Timely refund where credit accumulation takes place – to be avoided by design where feasible.
  • PAN-linked taxpayer identification number, to allow for easy sharing of information across the different tax administrations, including income tax.
  • Table 1: What Is Service Sector as Per NIC Classification?

    NIC-2004 Activity
    55 Hotels and restaurants
    602 Other land transport
    61 Water transport
    63 Supporting and auxiliary transport activities: activities of travel agencies
    64 Post and telecommunications
    659 Other financial intermediation.
    (This group includes financial intermediation other than that conducted by
    monetary institutions.)
    66 Insurance and pension funding, except compulsory social security
    67 Activities auxiliary to financial intermediation
    70 Real estate activities
    71 Renting of machinery and equipment without operator and
    of personal and household goods
    72 Computer and related activities
    73 Research and development
    74 Other business activities
    80 Education
    85 Health and social work
    90 Sewage and refuse disposal, sanitation and similar activities 9191 Activities of religious organisations 9199 Activities of other membership organisations NEC 92 Recreational, cultural and sporting activities 93 Other service activities january 2, 2010 vol xlv no 1 Economic & Political Weekly


    – “Keeping in mind the need of taxpayer’s convenience, functions such as assessment, enforcement, scrutiny and audit would be undertaken by the authority which is collecting the tax, with information sharing between the centre and the states.”

    Some Observations on the Proposed Design

    Since this is a discussion paper, with the decisions not completely frozen yet, it may be useful to highlight some of the limitations of the proposed design. In the following discussion, an attempt is made to identify some of the key features which might benefit from a re-examination.

    (1) Rate Structure: The rationale for the proposed rate structure is reasonably clear. However, it is important to define what constitutes a necessity or a good of basic importance. In the present VAT regime, a number of inputs were classified in the lower rate, which, as have been often argued does not deliver any benefits in a VAT regime. In the classification of commodities, therefore, it would be useful to limit the coverage of goods in the lower category to a bare minimum. In other words, adopt a conservative definition of “necessity”.

    • Apart from this dimension, it is not exceptions are electricity duty and passenger and goods tax at the state level. As stated in the discussion paper, “In the GST, both the cascading effects of CENVAT and service tax are removed with set-off and a continuous chain of set-off…is established which reduces the burden of all cascading effects. This is the essence of GST and this is why GST is not simply VAT plus service tax.” However, retaining these two levies outside GST and keeping crude, and other petroleum taxes outside the base for GST contributes to cascading in the system. It is useful to ask whether, the inclusion of any of these levies into the base would alter the “revenue neutral rates” substantially. This could be one reason for choosing this approach. The following section attempts to answer this question, at least so far as electricity duty and passenger and goods tax are concerned.

    (4) Proposed Thresholds: While it is not clear whether the discussion paper is proposing a design for both central and state GSTs or not, there is no spelt out rationale for having separate exemption thresholds for these taxes. A higher exemption threshold for the central GST would imply a significant cost of transition from one rate category to another for any taxpayer.

    For the thresholds discussed for instance,

    Table 2: Service Sector Sales as Per NIC Classification

    clear, why the discussion paper espouses (in Rs crore) at Rs 1.5 crore turnover, there would be a

    Sales Data: As Per NIC Code 2007-08

    the cause of two rates for the central GST sharp increase in the rate from only SGST

    Service sector sales (all-India) 3,35,189

    as well. The need for special treatment to SGST+CGST. This could encourage

    Revised sales figure 8,44,986

    of “necessities” is ensured by one of the units to under-report turnover at this

    GDP at factor cost 43,20,892

    taxes adopting a preferential treatment threshold or to split a firm into two parts

    Service sector GDP 23,39,468

    approach. By allowing the other tax to so as to avoid the central tax. The sheer

    Service sector sale as % of GDP 19.6

    be neutral among these commodities, the fact that these taxpayers would be part of

    Service sector sale as % of service sector GDP 36.1 incentive of the taxpayer to comply with Service sector excluding exempt sectors 12,27,470 the SGST system implies that they would the regime can be augmented. Sharp dif-SS sales as % of services excl exempt services 68.8 have the accounting keeping and other

    ferences between the rate of tax applicable to these two categories of commodities could discourage compliance at the margin.

    • In the treatment of services, while a single rate is proposed, it is not clear whether this rate would be aligned to the standard rate for goods or not. Choosing a different rate for taxation of services would encourage misclassification at the margin without delivering additional benefits. It would be useful and simple for an alignment of the standard rate for goods with the rate applicable to services.

  • (2) Treatment of Interstate Services: While it is recognised in most of the discussions on GST that a clear definition of treatment of services spanning more than one state is essential before the states can be assigned a comprehensive power to tax services, the discussion paper does not provide enough inputs on this subject. Since most of these services contribute substantial amount of revenue in the present service tax, it would be imperative in the interest of clarity to spell out the proposed treatment of such services, especially for the service providers since they would need to realign their administrative systems to account for a substantially altered tax and accounting regime.
  • (3) Taxes to be Subsumed: While a number of the important taxes are proposed to be subsumed into GST, two important
  • Economic & Political Weekly

    january 2, 2010 vol xlv no 1

    such compliance features in place. The higher threshold for the central tax would therefore be tax incentive for small businesses. Given the overall decision to keep the tax regime free of tax incentives, it is useful to evaluate whether the central tax should have a higher exemption threshold of Rs 1.5 crore for goods and a completely different threshold for the taxation of services.

    (5) Administration of the Tax: The discussion paper emphasises at a number of places that there is need for harmonisation of the forms and procedures, and the taxing provisions across the different tax administrations. This view is expressed in the context of the formulation of the tax statutes as well as in the context of forms and procedures. While this a commendable position to take, and would allow for considerable ease in compliance, once an agreement of this kind has been possible, it is tempting to ask whether one cannot go a step further and explore the possibility of a single registration and a single return. This process need not undermine the administrative independence of the tax departments, and yet could provide a significant simplification for the taxpayer. Given that the tax departments are proposing a common PAN-linked taxpayer identification number, such a process along with a common information system would remove “sharing of information” from a task to a fact and thereby improving tax administration significantly.


    Table 3: Input Coefficients and the Adjusted Base
    Taxable Share of Sales Net Ad-
    Inputs/Output Used as ditional Base
    Ratio Inputs (Rs Crore)
    Hotel and restaurant services 0.310535 0.137036 5,906
    Transport services 0.407863 0.43389334 41,279
    Post and telecommunication services 0.124205 0.70641745 33,211
    Financial services 0.07555 0.72606917 39,070
    Real estate activities 0.046972 0.06472144 23,187
    Renting of machinery and equipment without
    operator and of personal and household goods 0.015183 0.64301983 4,679
    Computer and related activities 0.103611 0.07353309 86,181
    Research and development 0.045501 0.00088177 54
    Other business activities 0.127913 0.84847271 21,475
    Education 0.127913 0.00088177 15,712
    Health and social work 0.299092 0.00893679 474
    Sewage and refuse disposal, sanitation
    and similar activities
    Activities of religious organisations and other
    membership organisations 0.13176031 0.41057617 868
    Recreational, cultural and sporting activities 0.13176031 0.41057617 6,282
    Total 2,78,384
    Additional services coming under tax net
    Railways: Passenger earnings 11,750
    Railways: Freight on exempt commodities 2,471
    Air fare 20,606
    Electricity value added – domestic consumption 23,540
    Electricity value added – agriculture consumption 31,735
    Services excluded in the estimation of base
    Real estate activities 23,187
    Computer and related activities 86,181
    Net additional base for GST 2,59,119

    Source: Derived by authors using Input Output Tables, Prowess database and service tax collections.

    Apart from the pure design of the tax, there are two important issues raised by the discussion paper – one, relating the mechanism for upholding the harmonious structure being proposed and, second, for compensation of current revenue from central sales tax (CST) on a permanent basis. It would be useful to explore what each of these issues suggests.

    In the context of the first issue, the discussion paper suggests that

    “an appropriate mechanism that will be binding on both the centre and the states would be worked out whereby the harmonious rate structure could be upheld, if necessary with a collectively agreed upon constitutional amendment”.

    It is far from clear from this statement what form the mechanism is expected to take. States in India have been strongly vociferous on issues of fiscal autonomy. At one extreme, the above proposal could mean an agreement on uniformity which gets enshrined in the Constitution. At the other extreme, it could require the setting up of an institution which can monitor and limit the scope for variation across states. In the regime of state VAT, the central compensation package provided the tool for ensuring a degree of compliance with the agreed structure. However, since compensation packages are likely to be limited to a few years, the discussion paper proposes to explore some alternative means of ensuring compliance. It is important to recognise that any measure proposed would limit the autonomy of the states and possibly that of the centre as well. A conscious decision can, however, still be encouraged in the interest of simplicity and integration of the country into a single common market.

    The second contentious issue in the discussion paper relates to the compensation for loss of CST revenue. The discussion paper states that “the rate of CST has already been reduced to 2% and will be phased out with effect from the date of introduction of GST on the basis of such GST structure which, with necessary financial support to the states, should adequately compensate for the loss of the states on a permanent basis.”

    There are potentially two views on this topic: one, since CST is an origin-based tax, it resulted in a flow of revenue from consumers in one state to the exchequer of another state. Since the former do not derive any benefits from the services provided by the latter, such a tax is unfair. Compensation for such a tax, that too on a permanent basis, therefore would be unfair. The second view would be that since some states have been extensively dependent on this source of revenue, it would be unfair to propose a drastic reorganisation of the tax powers, thereby limiting the revenues from such a source.

    It should be mentioned here that the expanded base in GST potentially does provide a cover for the erosion in base as a result of elimination of CST. This, however, does not apply symmetrically across all states. Mineral-rich states, for instance, could lose revenue from CST without adequate gains from expansion in base from services. Whether this situation calls for a sustained compensation package or a change in some other parameter, such as royalty on minerals, needs to be explored in some depth in attempting to find a solution to this problem.

    3 Assessment of the Tax Base and Revenue Neutral Rates

    We have taken data for the fiscal year 2007-08 for the purpose of RNR calculations, since that is the latest year for which comprehensive data is available. For the purposes of this exercise, we have defined the revenue target as equiva-

    Table 4: Additional Increase in Base

    lent to that raised through VAT, CST and electric-

    Due to GST: Major States (Rs crore)

    ity duty at present. While there are some other

    Andhra Pradesh 19,729

    taxes proposed to be subsumed into GST, since

    Bihar 8,824 Chhattisgarh 3,206

    information on the bases associated with these Goa 917 taxes is not accessible, they are kept outside Gujarat 14,877 the exercise. Haryana 7,414 It may be mentioned that since these taxes Kerala 13,849 come with some associated bases, it would not

    Karnataka 15,667

    be incorrect to assume that the overall rates

    Madhya Pradesh 9,570

    would not be altered substantially by this exclu-

    Maharashtra 43,923

    sion. The approach adopted in this exercise is as

    Orissa 5,397

    follows: for the goods part of the tax base, the

    Punjab 8,110

    base presently under tax by the state govern-

    Rajasthan 9,308

    ments is taken as an estimate and for the services

    Tamil Nadu 21,790

    component, the sales turnover for various activi-

    Uttar Pradesh 21,685

    ties for companies covered by the Prowess data-

    West Bengal 21,934

    base is taken. Since information on the turnover

    Total 2,26,200 Source: Computed. associated with state VAT is not readily available,

    january 2, 2010 vol xlv no 1


    the information on revenues was used to derive an estimate for For all the services, two kinds of adjustments have been made, the taxable base, based on the following assumptions. Thirty per viz, deduction for taxable inputs used for service provision and cent of the trade tax revenue has been deducted on account of deduction of services provided when used as inputs into taxable revenue from petrol, diesel and alcohol. For the rest of the reve-activities. For these corrections, the input-output table for nue, 2% of total taxable turnover is assumed to be taxes at 1%, 2006-07 has been used to derive service specific input-output 33% of the taxable turnover at 4% tax rate and the rest at the ratios (Table 3, p 52). As evident from Table 2, service sector sale standard rate of 12.5%. as a percentage of service sector GDP excluding

    Table 5: The Revenue Neutral Rates

    To arrive at the base for services, we have Single Rate Two Rates the exempt sector works out to be 68.8%. How
    started with the National Industries Classifica- Andhra Pradesh 9.30 11.69 ever, this is a gross base which has been cor
    tion (NIC) code of 2004 to identify what consti- Bihar 6.80 7.72 rected for inputs, for which tax credit will be
    tutes the service sector industry at the national Chhattisgarh 12.00 15.47 claimed, and for use as the services as an inter
    level (Table 1, p 50). Having obtained the NIC Goa 9.07 11.36 mediate input, to arrive at the net taxable base.
    classification, we have used the Prowess data- Gujarat 11.82 15.26 Further, when one is talking about the sale
    base (CMIE) to find out what could be the available base for services for the purpose of taxation at the national level. It is important to understand what is available Haryana Kerala Karnataka Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra 10.72 8.78 9.67 9.65 9.84 13.71 10.22 12.18 11.95 12.19 within a state one has to exclude exports and include imports. Given the nature of the service sector, a major part of the service export would be IT export.
    from the Prowess database. Prowess is a data- Orissa 10.49 13.22 In order to derive a conservative estimate of
    base of large and medium Indian firms. It con- Punjab 9.62 11.95 the base we have excluded the entire computer
    tains detailed information on over 20,000 firms. Rajasthan 9.63 12.09 and related activities from the base (Table 3).
    These comprise: (1) All companies traded on In- Tamil Nadu 9.25 11.53 We have also excluded real estate activities and
    dia’s major stock exchanges, (2) several others Uttar Pradesh 9.05 11.11 limited the tax base for the following services ac
    including the central public sector enterprises, West Bengal 8.35 9.85 cording to the service tax collection, viz, research
    (3) the database covers most of the organised in- All states 9.69 12.05 and development, education and health services.
    dustrial activities, (4) banking, and (5) organised financial and other services sectors in India. Table 6: RNR with a Comprehensive Base Single Rate Two Rates After all these corrections, the net tax base as reported in Table 3, is Rs 2,59,119 crore.
    The companies covered in Prowess account Andhra Pradesh 9.96 12.40 The real challenge is to arrive at the sale of
    for 75% of all corporate taxes and over 95% of Bihar 8.46 9.35 services in individual states. We have estimated
    excise duty collected by the government of In- Chhattisgarh 9.39 10.51 the share of states in total base by applying
    dia. Prowess provides detailed information on Goa 3.90 3.80 individual states share in total value added in
    each company. This includes a database of the Gujarat 12.22 15.51 the service sector in the country. The estimated
    financials covering 1,500 data items and ratios Haryana 10.21 12.21 base for individual states for services is given in
    per company. Besides, it provides quantitative Kerala 8.82 9.96 Table 4 (p 52) and the corresponding revenue
    information on production, sales, consumption Karnataka 11.05 13.84 neutral rates in Table 5.
    of raw material and energy use. The data ex- Madhya Pradesh 10.53 12.54 We have estimated two rates: (i) RNR at a single
    tracted on the service sector sale at all India level is reported in Table 2 (p 51). As evident, this, for 2007-08, works out to be Rs 3,35,189 crore. The all-India services sector sales as Maharashtra OrissaPunjabRajasthanTamil Nadu 12.12 9.68 8.46 9.05 10.85 15.74 11.12 9.69 10.69 13.68 rate, and (ii) if there are two rates, where the present category of 4% goods continue to be taxed at 4%. In the case of two rates, we assumed the same share of the turnover as taxed in the case
    reported in Prowess data set as a percentage of Uttar Pradesh 9.99 12.30 of goods tax will also be taxed at the 4% rates.
    service sector’s GDP works out to be around 7% West Bengal 9.46 11.27 It should be highlighted that the closer we
    of GDP and 14% of service sector GDP and around Average Rate 10.30 12.52 are to a single rate regime, the lower will be the
    one-third of the service sector GDP excluding corresponding RNR. In other words, if, there

    the exempted sector. are no or fewer commodities in the 4% category, the RNR as

    Sales data obtained from the Prowess data set is a very con-shown in Table 3 can be considerably lower. If, for instance, servative estimate of service sector activity. We have tried to have the tax base subject to 4% rate is limited to 20% of the taxable a more realistic estimate of the service sector base by mapping turnover of goods instead of 33%, the revenue neutral rate service-wise tax collection data against the data on sales obtained can be brought down by over a percentage point for each of the as per the NIC code and adjusting the turnover/sales based on states considered. the tax collected from each category of services. Having done As mentioned earlier, having GST without some of the importhis adjustment, we have obtained a revised sales figure for the tant services being subsumed may result in cascading and service sector at Rs 7,54,883 crore. This is further adjusted for also the real benefit of GST as a non-distortionary tax without cassome of the important currently exempt services which would cading would be substantially compromised. Thus, it is important be part of the GST base, viz, railway passenger fare and railway to find out if inclusion of both goods and passenger tax and the freight on exempt commodities, electricity revenues from sup-electricity duty would alter the revenue neutral rates to a signifiplies to domestic consumers and exempt sectors and air fares. cant extent. We have reworked the revenue neutral rates when

    Economic & Political Weekly EPW january 2, 2010 vol xlv no 1


    both these taxes are subsumed in the state GST and the lower rate of tax is 5%. The numbers are reported in Table 6 (p 53). It shows that even with these two additional taxes the revenue neutral rates increase marginally.

    4 Conclusions

    The Empowered Committee’s first discussion paper on GST is a very valuable document in laying the foundations for the proposed new regime of GST in India. Given the concerted effort to introduce such a major change in the tax regime with a consensus among all the states concerned, there are often concessions made to preserve the consensus. The introduction of a discussion paper, however, allows for a discussion on the proposed design.

    The objective of the present exercise is to highlight, in the context of the estimated tax base, the gains from exploring some alternatives to those proposed in the discussion paper. For instance, from the discussion in Section 2, it would be apparent that inclusion of electricity duty and passenger and goods tax into the tax base does not substantially raise the revenue neutral rate. It is therefore not clear why these taxes are sought to be kept out. Similarly, it would be worth exploring whether the list of commodities under 4% rate can be pruned to a minimum. It is possible to argue that some combination of smaller number of commodities at the 4% rate and an expansion in the coverage to cover both electricity duty and passenger and goods tax could actually leave the revenue neutral rate unchanged and yet result in a superior design of the tax.

    It may be mentioned that the base as computed in the present exercise is a very conservative base. It corrects for all forms of transactions across sectors where input tax credit could be claimed. There is, however, no attempt to incorporate real estate activities into the tax base. While it is widely debated that these activities should be brought within the tax net, there appear to exist some limitations in doing so. The issues related to valuation of real estate transactions as evident in the case of stamp duty would continue to dog taxation in this activity, especially for transactions in pre-existing property. In the absence of a clear mandate to tax only new houses or to tax only commercial property, where the taxation would result in a symmetric tax credit and hence no revenue additionality, the view taken by this paper is not to include these activities into the base.


    Global Economic & Financial Crisis

    Essays from Economic and Political Weekly

    In this volume economists and policymakers from across the world address a number of aspects of the global economic crisis. One set of articles discusses the structural causes of the financial crisis. A second focuses on banking and offers solutions for the future. A third examines the role of the US dollar in the unfolding of the crisis. A fourth area of study is the impact on global income distribution. A fifth set of essays takes a long-term view of policy choices confronting the governments of the world.

    A separate section assesses the downturn in India, the state of the domestic financial sector, the impact on the informal economy and the reforms necessary to prevent another crisis.

    This is a collection of essays on a number of aspects of the global economic and financial crisis that were first published in the Economic & Political Weekly in early 2009.

    Pp viii + 368 2009 Rs 350


    Essays from Economic and Political Weekly

    A compilation of essays that were first published in the EPW in a special issue in May 2007. Held together with an introduction by Sekhar Bandyopadhyay, the essays – that range in theme and subject from historiography and military engagements, to the dalit viranganas idealised in traditional songs and the “unconventional protagonists” in mutiny novels – converge on one common goal: to enrich the existing national debates on the 1857 Uprising.

    The volume has 18 essays by well known historians who include Biswamoy Pati, Dipesh Chakrabarty, Peter Robb and Michael Fisher.The articles are grouped under five sections: ‘Then and Now’, ‘Sepoys and Soldiers’, ‘The Margins’, ‘Fictional Representations’ and ‘The Arts and 1857’.

    Pp viii + 364 2008 Rs 295

    Available from

    Orient Blackswan Pvt Ltd

    Mumbai Chennai New Delhi Kolkata Bangalore Bhubaneshwar Ernakulam Guwahati Jaipur Lucknow Patna Chandigarh Hyderabad Contact:

    january 2, 2010 vol xlv no 1

    Dear Reader,

    To continue reading, become a subscriber.

    Explore our attractive subscription offers.

    Click here

    Back to Top