In their response to my critique of their article on Direct Cash Transfers, Kapur, Mukhopadhyay and Subramanian (EPW, 22 November 2008; henceforth KMS), state “The thought that durable infrastructure can be built largely by manual labour would be amusing, if it were not irresponsible” (p 87). Statements such as these are sadly commonplace, sometimes even among proponents of National Rural Employment Guarantee Act.
Decades of work on programmes such as watershed development have credibly demonstrated the massive potential of earthen engineering that relies mainly on manual labour.
Comments
EPW looks forward to your comments. Please note that comments are moderated as per our comments policy. They may take some time to appear. A comment, if suitable, may be selected for publication in the Letters pages of EPW.