ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Urban Schooling


Letters

Letters

‘Rent a State’ Economics

S
uhas Chattopadhyay in ‘A Rejoinder to ‘Rent-a-Womb Economics’ ’ (February 11, 2006), endorses the proposal of selling off agricultural land in West Bengal to foreigners on the ground that the amount realised from such sales, if put in a savings account in a bank or post office, would fetch a sum more than double of what a peasant currently earns from agricultural activities. This argument reduces the problem of development to the functioning of a real estate dealer-cum-rentier: some destination to arrive at for a regime, which claims to have faith in Marxist tenets!

The total landmass of West Bengal amounts to 88,752 square kilometres. If the entire state is put up for sale to foreigners, the realisation, at the quoted price of Rs 1,20,000 per acre, should be, in case my arithmetic is correct, in the neighbourhood of 1,500 billion rupees. If kept in banks, with an interest rate of 8 per cent per annum, the people of West Bengal would then have an annual income of 120 billion rupees. Would they agree to such a transaction?

AM

Kolkata

Tribal Identities

T
he recent ruling by the Supreme Court that a “non-tribal man” married to a woman belonging to a scheduled tribe (and scheduled caste) cannot claim a corresponding scheduled tribe (caste) status for securing employment in the government under the reserved category seems, on the face of it, both inconsistent and deeply offensive to the concept of gender equality and justice and indeed the very dignity of a woman, tribal and non-tribal. Such cautionary limitation is not prescribed in instances where a tribal man is married to a non-tribal woman, perhaps on the patriarchal assumption that the non-tribal woman in such unions would axiomatically assume and be entitled to a tribal status.

There could be an element of opportunism (“procuring of bogus caste certificates”) in instances of marriage between non-tribal males and tribal women, though there are also numerous instances of such unions inspired by genuine love and loyalty.

Rather more problematic is the extension of a similar cautionary limitation, in respect of the rights and entitlements available to scheduled tribes, to children born to a non-tribal father and a tribal mother, in effect denying the very tribal identity of children born of such unions. The ruling, as reported in The Hindu (February 17) explicitly lays down that the “offshoots of the wedlock of a tribal woman married to a non-tribal husband (forward class) cannot claim scheduled tribe status”, the reason being that children out of such unions were brought up “in the atmosphere of forward class”. In other words, since the non-tribal father was not subjected to any disability, the child born of the union of such a father with a tribal mother too should be considered as not suffering from any such disability.

Apart from not being true, such a distinction and the prescription that follows will certainly not work in matrilineal tribal societies, as for instance among the Garos and the Khasis of Meghalaya, where what has historically determined and in current practice continues to define a child’s identity and informs the course of the child’s whole life unto death is the mother’s identity, not the father’s.

(Continued on p 836)

Correction

World Wide Fund for Nature

In the article ‘ ‘Million Revolts’ in the Making’ (February 18, p 571), under the sub-heading ‘Background and Process’, the sentence should read “This introductory article and the 18 case studies (see the figure for the listing of the cases and their locations) that follow have their roots in a process initiated by the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) project, ‘Dialogue on Water, Food and Environment’ ”. WWF was wrongly rendered as World Wildlife Fund for Nature.

Subscription

Inland

(Rs)

Six One Two Three months year years years

Institutions – 1250 2300 3300 Individuals 500 935 1750 2500

Concessional Rates

Teachers/Researchers – 685 – 1800 Students – 450 – –

Concessional rates are available only in India. To avail of concessional rates, certificate from relevant institution is essential. Remittance by money order/bank draft preferred. Please add Rs 35 to outstation cheques towards bank collection charges.

Nepal and Bhutan

Institutions – 1500 – 4150 Individuals – 1250 – 3500

Foreign

(US $)

Air Mail Surface Mail

Institutions

1yr 2yrs 3yrs 1yr 2yrs 3yrs Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh 80 150 200 65 120 175 Other countries 150 275 375 90 170 240

Individuals Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh 50 90 125 30 50 75 Other countries 100 175 240 65 120 170

All remittances to:

Economic and Political Weekly

Economic and Political Weekly

Hitkari House, 284 Shahid Bhagatsingh Road, Mumbai 400 001 Phones: 2269 6072/73 Fax: (022) 2269 6072 epw.mumbai@gmail.com edit@epw.org.in Editor (December 1969-January 2004) : Krishna Raj

Editor : C Rammanohar Reddy

Deputy Editor : Bernard D’Mello

Assistant Editors : Anuradha Kumar, Vimala Subramanian, Sheba Tejani Bharati Bhargava (Delhi)

Editorial Staff : Prabha Pillai

Editorial Consultant : Gautam Navlakha (Delhi)

Circulation : Gauraang Pradhan (Manager), B S Sharma circulation@epw.org.in

Advertisement Manager : Kamal G Fanibanda advt@epw.org.in

General Manager and Publisher : K Vijayakumar

EPW Research Foundation

C 212, Akurli Industrial Estate, Kandivali (East) Mumbai 400 101, Phones: 2887 3038/3041 Fax: (022) 2887 3038. epwrf@vsnl.com

Director : S L Shetty

Economic and Political Weekly March 4, 2006

Letters

(Continued from p 766)

Attempts to “reform” such practices have not made any progress because of the involvement of too many disputatious material issues, like inheritance rights, organically linked to the very structure of such societies.

Perhaps someone with legal expertise and understanding of tribal societies should clarify the judgment.

M S PRABHAKARA

Guwahati

Urban Schooling

I
t was heartening to read Vimala Ramachandran’s commentary on ‘Urban Schooling’ (February 4, 2006). But I wanted to place my apprehensions about one of the mechanisms she has suggested: Holding of “periodic activities such as competitions, exhibitions of the work of children, science and mathematics fairs and so on” (p 384).

My experience with the schools in Delhi shows that such activities might have a negative effect on learning levels of children, in the concrete context of our municipal schools. Whether to participate in the science fairs or scholarship exams, what happens is that teachers choose a few children, naturally the best ones and spend time with them to prepare them. Meanwhile, the rest of the class is left to its own devices. In effect this means that the learning opportunities for the class as a whole and for the ones who need it the most, are actually reduced.

Perhaps we could consider random assessment exercises of children’s learning levels by an independent agency and prizes for the teachers of the classes which perform better. Maybe the teachers need more incentives than children, who as has been mentioned, are already very eager to learn. The class character of teachers is not easy to change, but an immediate step, which could be taken, is the holding of special sensitisation workshops for the teachers of first generation learners. These workshops would have to be specially designed keeping in mind the real belief systems that teachers may hold.

USHA MENON

New Delhi

Notes to Contributors

Here are some guidelines fortake up to six to eight months from the address, day-time phone numbers andauthors who wish to make date of acceptance to appear in the email address. submissions to the journal. EPW. Every effort will, however, be made (The email address of writers in the Special

to ensure early publication. Papers with Article, Commentary and Discussion

Special Articles

immediate relevance for policy would be sections will be published at the end ofEPW welcomes original research papers in

considered for early publication. Please the article.)

any of the social sciences.

note that this is a matter of editorial * Authors are requested to prepare their

* Articles must be no more than 8,000

judgment. soft copy versions in text formats. PDF

words, including notes, references

versions are not accepted by the EPW.

and tables. Longer articles will not be Commentaries

Authors are encouraged to use UK Englishprocessed. EPW invites short contributions to the spellings (Writers using MS Word or

  • * Contributions should be sent in a hard ‘Commentary’ section on topical social, similar software could change thecopy format accompanied by a floppy/ economic and political developments. These appropriate settings in the LanguageCD version. A soft copy can also be should ideally be between 1,000 and 2,500 menu of the application).sent by email. Hard and soft copy words and exclusive to the EPW. * Contributors are requested to send articlesversions of articles are essential for Short contributions may be sent by email. that are complete in all respects, includingprocessing. references, as this facilitates quicker
  • * Special articles should be Book Reviews processing. accompanied by an abstract of a EPW sends out books for review. It does not * When there are major developments in
  • maximum of 150-200 words. normally accept unsolicited reviews. How-the field of study after the first submission,
  • * Papers should not have been ever, all reviews that are received are read authors can send a revised version. simultaneously submitted for publication with interest and where a book has not been EPW requests writers not to send to another journal or newspaper. If the sent out for review, the unsolicited review is revised versions based on stylistic
  • paper has appeared earlier in a different on occasion considered for publication. changes/additions, deletions of version, we would appreciate a copy of references, minor changes, etc, as this

    Letters

    this along with the submitted paper. poses challenges in processing.

    * Graphs and charts prepared in MS Readers of EPW are encouraged to send * All submissions will be acknowledgedcomments and suggestions (300-400 words)

    Office (Word/Excel) or equivalent software immediately on receipt with a reference

    on published articles to the Letters column. number. Quoting the reference numberare preferable to material prepared in All letters should have the writer’s full name in inquiries will help.

    jpeg or other formats.

    * Every effort is taken to complete early and postal address. * EPW posts all published articles on its web processing of the papers we receive.

    site and may reproduce them on CDs.

    Discussion

    Since we receive more than 35 articles Address for communication:

    EPW encourages researchers to comment

    every week and adequate time has to be Economic and Political Weekly,

    on Special Articles. Submissions should be

    provided for internal reading and external Hitkari House,

    1,000 to 2,000 words.

    refereeing. It can take up to four 284 Shahid Bhagatsingh Road, months for a final decision on whether General Guidelines Mumbai 400 001, India. the paper is accepted for publication. * Writers are requested to provide full Email: edit@epw.org.in,

    * Articles accepted for publication can details for correspondence: postal epw.mumbai@gmail.com

    Economic and Political Weekly March 4, 2006

    Dear Reader,

    To continue reading, become a subscriber.

    Explore our attractive subscription offers.

    Click here

    Back to Top