ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Historicality in Literature: Subalternist Misrepresentations

In History at the Limits of World History, the historian Ranajit Guha makes an extraordinary plea - for the historian to 'recover the living history of the quotidian' and to 'recuperate the historicality of what is humble and habitual' so as to turn the historian into a 'creative writer'. Yet Tagore, whose essay Guha cites in his work, and much later J M Coetzee, had protested at literature being subsumed by history; a history that was taken to be a 'fixed, selfevident reality to which the novel was supposed to bear witness'. While the question whether creative writing is a better way of writing subaltern history is to be debated, the repercussions of such a move on the future course of subaltern historiography remain to be seen.

To read the full text Login

Get instant access

New 3 Month Subscription
to Digital Archives at

₹826for India

$50for overseas users

Comments

(-) Hide

EPW looks forward to your comments. Please note that comments are moderated as per our comments policy. They may take some time to appear. A comment, if suitable, may be selected for publication in the Letters pages of EPW.

Back to Top