ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Investment Gaps in Primary Education

Investment Gaps in Primary Education Jandhyala B G Tilak WHILE making an estimate of investment gaps in primary education in India, Ramachandran et al (1997) have commented on my study [Tilak and Kar 1994] that estimated requirement of resources for education by levels of education, including specifically elementary education (classes I-VIII/age-group 6-14), and by major states in India up to 2000 AD.1 Applying the unit costs of education (for a select few major items) provided by the government of West Bengal (GOWB) to all states in India and using National Sample Survey Organisation's (NSSO) data on enrolments and non-enrolments, Ramachandran et al (1997) estimated investment gaps in primary education in 1995. They seem to argue that this is the best method and that the method l had adopted has serious flaws. Their main criticism of my study refers to (a) my use of official enrolment figures instead of actual attendance rates by age- group, (b) use of 'expenditure per student' instead of 'costs of education', and (c) specification of the cost function. They also argue that ours was not a 'normative' method. I find these comments irrelevant and misleading, as I discuss them in Section 1. Research in this area is not abundant.2 Hence at the very outset I welcome the attempt by Ramachandran et al. But Ramachandran et at's approach and analysis have serious pitfalls, which are described in Section 2.

To read the full text Login

Get instant access

New 3 Month Subscription
to Digital Archives at

₹826for India

$50for overseas users

Comments

(-) Hide

EPW looks forward to your comments. Please note that comments are moderated as per our comments policy. They may take some time to appear. A comment, if suitable, may be selected for publication in the Letters pages of EPW.

Back to Top