of unequal or unbalanced regional development, both because the state would like to Improve its own position in national ranking and because within the state interregional disparities have been the source of serious political and cultural tensions. However planning itself has not made a significant impact in rectifying these imbalances, and planning in India too has more often adjusted to the realities and logic of capitalist development rather than try to alter this logic in any important way. Seminars, such as the present one, place far too much emphasis on the role of planning in which econo- mists, technocrats and bureaucrats have an exaggerated notion of their impact and control on the course of events. The problem of growth is particularly tricky for the so-called 'agricultural states', such as Andhra Pradesh, which have not benefited from the 'industrialisation' of the 1950s and the 1960s. Having concentrated on agriculture at the time when industrial growth was of a high order, they want to diversify into industry now at a time when both nationally and globally capitalist industrialisation is passing through a recessionary phase. Thus, while the excessive reliance on agriculture has made diversification imperative, the possibilities for such diversification are limited in the present phase of 'inflationary contraction', In practice, this has has led over the last few years to desperate attempts by 8tate governments to corner the few new investments being made, vying with one another to offer all manner of concessions to private capital. Big business houses have made good use of these concessions.